If we read about the experiences of successful investors, we will find that all of them had their own specific methodology of picking stocks. They, in turn, might have been inspired by other successful investors. However, there is not anyone specific approach to stock picking, which has made them successful.
Benjamin Graham focused on investing in stocks that were selling at a discount to their fair value. This is an example of the Value Investing approach. Philip Arthur Fisher (Phil Fisher) focused on investing in stocks that were capable of growing at a faster pace as compared to their peers. He justified paying a premium for such high growth stocks and did not stress too much on finding stocks selling at a discount to their fair value. This is an example of the Growth Investing approach.
Warren Buffett studied under Benjamin Graham during college and therefore focused more on value investing in the initial stages of his career. However, later on, he incorporated the guidelines of Phil Fisher in his investment philosophy. Now, as per Buffett, his investment methodology is a mix of about 85% Graham and 15% Fisher.
So we can see that there is not only one single defined approach to achieve success in stock picking. In fact, it is rightly said that ‘All roads lead to Rome’. However, each one of these approaches has its own pros and cons. These stock-picking approaches might differ in terms of the types of stocks they focus on. These approaches might also differ in terms of the amount of time & effort required from investors and in many more ways. A stock-picking approach, which is suitable for one investor may not be suitable for another. However, it is easy to find the stock-picking approach or a mix of the approaches, which will be suitable for an investor. This article would help the readers to find such a suitable stock-picking approach.
I have discussed various approaches to stock picking below. We, as investors, should learn a bit about these different stock-picking approaches and then select the approach or the mixture of approaches, which appeals to us.
Fundamental Analysis vs. Technical Analysis
Fundamental analysis of a stock involves understanding the underlying business of a company. While doing fundamental analysis, the investor tries to find out a company, which has a very good product, well-known customers, stable suppliers, honest & capable management etc. Once she finds such a company, then she can invest in its stock and expect to benefit from the future growth of the business of the company. Fundamental analysis is very similar to the in-depth analysis, which an entrepreneur will do before starting a new business. I believe that the fundamental analysis approach to stock picking is, in fact, a form of entrepreneurship.
Technical analysis involves analyzing charts of the past movements of a stock’s price and its trading volume over different time periods. It involves understanding the patterns in the charts containing data of a stock’s price movement in the past. The investor then tries to predict the future price movement of the stock based on these past patterns. Once the investor finds a stock whose price is expected to move higher, she buys it and holds it until the chart patterns indicate that the price is expected to fall or become stable. The investor following technical analysis is concerned only with the past prices and trading volume data of the stock. The investor is indifferent to whether the stock is of manufacturing, an agricultural or a financial services company.
Comparison between Fundamental Analysis and Technical Analysis:
Most of the successful stock market investors have followed the fundamental analysis. The fundamental analysis treats a stock investment as a way of having ownership in a company’s business. This approach allows an investor to benefit from the enormous wealth, which is generated by owning a successful business over a long period of time. On the other hand, Technical analysis tries to predict the next ‘up move’ in a stock’s price and is indifferent to the company’s business.
In fundamental analysis, once an investor has found a good company, she stays invested in its stock for decades. Hence, if the investor was able to make at least a few good stock investing decisions in her life, she will be able to earn a great amount of wealth. In technical analysis, the investor buys a stock just before the next ‘up move’ in its price. She sells the stock after the up move has happened or if the up move does not occur and the buying decision has been proved wrong. In technical analysis, the investor keeps the stock with herself only for a few days or weeks. Many times, investors try to buy and sell stocks with a few minutes during a day. Such kind of investment behaviour requires the investor to keep finding the right stocks every few minutes/days/weeks.
Almost all successful investors say that finding good stocks for investment is difficult. Therefore, if an investor has found such a stock, then she should stay invested in it for long periods. Selling a good stock only after one ‘up move’ in its price is not a winning decision in long term. Stock markets are very volatile and the periods of up & down moves in a stock’s price are going to be very frequent. Therefore, an investor should not fall prey to greed and she should not sell her stock when the prices move up immediately after she buys it. Moreover, the investor should stay invested in the stock until the company keeps on growing its business consistently.
I started stock market investing in 2006 by learning technical analysis. However, with the continued reading and personal experiences in stock picking, I realized that fundamental analysis is a better approach to stock picking. Therefore, I have been selecting stocks by using fundamental analysis since 2008.
Different sub-approaches under Fundamental Analysis:
Fundamental analysis has different sub-approaches to stock picking. All these sub-approaches focus on the underlying business of the companies. However, they differ in the methods of selecting stocks for detailed analysis and the features of stocks, which are focused on future gains.
Top-Down and Bottom-Up approaches:
The top-down approach to the fundamental analysis is also called EIC (economy-industry-company) approach. In the top-down approach, an investor tries to identify those economies (countries) of the world, which are expected to grow at a faster pace than other economies. Once the investor has found such economies, she studies them in detail. Within these economies, the investor tries to identify the industries, which are expected to witness higher growth than other industries. Once the investor has identified high growth industries in selected economies, she tries to find out the companies in these high growth industries, which are expected to benefit the most from such expected growth. Once the investor has finalized the list of such companies, she buys stocks of these companies. The investor expects to benefit from the higher earnings, which these companies are expected to create over the next many years.
The bottom-up approach to the fundamental analysis involves identifying companies, which are expected to grow their business without restricting the stock-picking search to any particular industry or economy (country). All the stocks listed in all the stock exchanges in the world, irrespective of country or industry of operation, are open for selection to the investor. The investor uses various selection criteria to search for the best stocks. Such selection criteria help an investor find out the companies he likes e.g. the fastest growing companies across all sectors or the companies, which are selling at a discount to the cash in their bank accounts. Once the investor finds a good company, he buys its stock and expects to benefit from the future growth of the business of the company.
Comparison between Top-Down and Bottom-Up approaches:
The top-down approach limits an investor’s analysis of stocks of only a few countries and a few industries. However, the bottom-up approach does not have this limitation. The bottom-up approach provides an investor with the option of investing in those companies, which are doing very good but are in industries, which are currently not doing well. Such companies are known to make huge wealth for investors. Peter Lynch, fund manager of Fidelity Magellan Fund from 1977 to 1990, has recommended investing in such companies in his book One Up on Wall Street.
Thus, we can see that the bottom-up approach gives an investor more options to choose his stocks for investment.
Growth Investing and Value Investing approach:
In the growth investing approach to fundamental analysis, the investor tries to find such companies, which are expected to witness very high growth in business performance in future. Once the investor has found such a company, she buys its stocks. The investor expects to benefit from the future high growth of the business of the company.
The investor following a value-investing approach of fundamental analysis tries to find the fair value of the stock of a company by analyzing various business and financial parameters of the company. After calculating the fair value of the stock of a company, the investor compares it with the current market price on a stock exchange. If the investor finds that the current stock price of the company is lower than the fair value of its stock as per her calculations, she buys the stocks of the company. The investor expects to benefit from the increase in the stock price aftermarket discovers the discount in the stock value and increases the stock price to its fair value.
Comparison between Growth Investing and Value Investing approaches:
In growth investing approach, the investor puts more focus on the future growth of the company and ignores the current valuation levels of its stock as compared to ongoing/past performance of the company’s business. The investor buys its stock at whatever price it is currently available in the stock market.
Value investing approach of stock picking is equivalent to finding goods selling at a discount in any market place e.g. a grocery store. A value investor will not buy the stock of a company, which is expected to show good business performance in future if its stock is currently selling at a price higher than its fair value. The value investor would think that the current expensive valuation has already increased the price of the stock of that company to such an extent that the potential of increase of the stock price in future is limited. The investor would ignore this company and start the search for another company whose stock is priced at a discount to the fair value.
If an investment decision goes wrong, then the risk of suffering losses, is much more in growth investing, as it does not focus on the current valuation of the stock price. If a company selected by growth investing approach does not grow as expected or its growth slows down a bit, the stock market will punish its stock. In such a case, the stock prices will fall very fast and the investor might lose a lot of her invested capital. However, in case of companies selected by value investing, if the stock market does not realize the discount available in the stock of a company soon, then its stock price might not increase in the short term. However, it would provide the investor with an opportunity to accumulate more stocks of this company. Thus value investing approach has a higher “Margin of Safety” as described by Benjamin Graham.
It is said that the market may keep ignoring the discount available on a stock for a very long time. Therefore, stock investing should have a very long-term investment horizon. It is similar to an investment in family land or real estate. You do not sell the land or property for every day-to-day financial need. Similarly, it is recommended not to sell stocks for day-to-day financial requirements and look at them from a very long-term perspective preferably in decades.
Our approach to Stock Picking
We have discussed the major approaches to stock picking. We have also seen comparative features of different stock-picking approaches. It was mentioned at the beginning of this article that every investor should choose an approach or a mix of approaches, which she likes. After reading books of various successful investors, who had followed different stock-picking approaches mentioned above and after personal experience of about 8 years of investing in Indian stock markets, I have found the following mix of stock picking approaches, which I like:
As previously mentioned, I prefer fundamental analysis for stock picking as compared to technical analysis. I like fundamental analysis because it treats an investor as an owner of the company and the fundamental investor needs to make only a few right investment decisions in her life to make significant wealth as compared to a technical investor. On the other hand, the technical investor needs to be on the lookout for the right stocks almost daily.
I prefer the bottom-up approach as compared to the top-down approach. If an investor follows the top-down approach, she would find that the stocks of the companies, which are expected to do good in high growth industries of such economies (countries), which are expected to outperform other economies, are already overpriced. This limits the choice of stocks available for her investments unless she decides to overpay for them. In the bottom-up approach, the investor focuses on the good companies irrespective of the industries and economies. Therefore, she is able to select stocks of good performing companies from all the industries whether these industries are growing at a fast or at a slow pace. If the investor follows the bottom-up approach to stock picking, she would have better chances of finding out companies, which are growing at a fast pace but whose stocks are priced at a discount currently.
Mix of Growth Investing and Value Investing approach to Fundamental Analysis:
I follow a mix of growth and value investing approaches. I search for companies, which have grown their earnings at a good pace in past and their earnings are expected to keep growing in future. Once I have prepared a list of such high growth companies, I try to find out the companies from this list, whose stocks are currently selling at a discount in the market. This is like having the best of both worlds and many readers might think that it won’t be easy to find such companies.
However, Indian stock markets are under-penetrated and only a few well-known stocks are well researched by market analysts. Most of the large investors like FIIs, mutual funds etc. focus on only about 400-500 stocks of large companies out of more than 5,000 companies listed on Indian stock exchanges. An investor can find the hidden gems among these balance 4,500 stocks, which are not getting analyzed by stock market analysts. These hidden gems offer an opportunity to invest in high growth companies, which are available at very reasonable stock prices. I focus on this under-analyzed segment of Indian stock markets to find potential stocks for my portfolio.
Thus to summarize, I follow a bottom-up fundamental analysis approach in which I look for high growth companies available at attractive stock prices.
Any person who wants to be an investor can learn about these approaches for stock picking. The investor can focus on the approaches which she finds suitable for her according to her temperament, work schedule, lifestyle etc. The investor can choose to pick the best of the characteristics of various stock-picking approaches and mix them to create an approach of her own.
Once the investor has decided about her stock-picking approach, she should start searching for companies whose stocks meet her criteria. The investor should keep on improvising her approach by incorporating lessons, which she would learn from further readings and personal experiences in stock picking.
At the start of Warren Buffett’s investing career, no one could tell whether he would be the most successful investor of all times. No one could predict the success of Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch or Phil Fisher. Similarly, no one knows whether you and I are going to become successful & wealthy investors. However, the current requirement is to put in the necessary effort in stock picking and wait for the future to unfold the results. Various investors have become successful in the past. I believe that I can be successful at stock picking and so can be anyone else who is willing to put in the required effort.
Our views on combining Fundamental and Technical Investing (Techno-Funda Investing)
Benjamin Graham also talked about the margin of safety. Anyway, I enjoyed reading your article and the criticism of technical analysis. I think you have made good use of the contrarian approach with your stock selection technique. I also think you would have made more if you had followed the trend and technical analysis strategies; you would have certainly had more returns (add opportunity cost of holding investment) if you had used trend analysis- buying Allahabad Bank during April-May 2009 (break of downtrend) than buying in Jun 2008 and similarly for others.
Fundamental analysis is important but it’s not everything; without a doubt for long term investing value investing is superior method; however, it will be difficult to practice for small investors- You got to have lots of money so that you can buy in every dip. Small investors, who can’t hold for ages, will cry if a breakout takes longer than anticipation.
For a small investor, technical analysis in conjunction with money management (position sizing), risk management (stop loss) can also win big- I have made 82% while market provided only 12% in 9 months period. The most importing thing is profitable belief about the stock, trading discipline and know-how to cut losses short and let profit run using a trading system.
I bet u can’t completely ignore technical analysis if u want to make your investment decision objective and profitable.
Thanks for providing your views.
We agree that there are many approaches, which investors use to invest/trade in the markets be it fundamental investing, technical investing, value investing, growth investing and so on. Each approach is suitable for different investors depending on their personal preferences like aptitude, availability of time etc. I advise investors to choose the approach that is suitable to them.
We do not think that value investing needs an investor to have lots of money. We find that every person who has surplus money to invest, irrespective of the quantum of money, can practice value investing and benefit from it. Value investing requires discipline and regular investing and not the quantum of money, to succeed.
As mentioned by you, we have provided my views about fundamental investing vs. technical investing in the following article:
We believe that fundamental investing is more suited to our investing approach and wish to keep following it going ahead.
Thanks once again for your inputs and all the best for your investing journey!
Should we adjust our investing approach based on predictions of analysts?
Hello Dr. Vijay,
In the last couple of weeks, many analysts are saying 2016 will not be a good year for Indian and global equities. Some are even mentioning situations not exactly like the 2008 recession but pretty similar to it.
What are your views on these statements?
We do not have any views on the markets or these statements.
We believe that an investor should look for fundamentally good companies and keep on investing in them until the time they are available at attractive valuations irrespective of the level of general markets.
You may use the following steps to find out fundamentally sound stocks:
All the best for your investing journey!
Operators in the Stock Market and Our Views about it
While analyzing some small-cap companies, I am frequently coming across a word in some forums – “Operator Stock”.
- What does it mean to a retail value investor?
- How a retail investor can identify the trap?
Your detailed view will be highly helpful.
“Operator stock” is usually referred to as the stock whose price is manipulated by different people. Small-cap stocks have a low market cap and operators need very low money to influence its price. For example, to increase the price to double for a ₹20cr. market cap company, an operator needs much less money than a ₹2.5 lakh cr market cap company.
As a fundamental long term investor, I do not worry about operators being active in stock, until the time I am convinced that the company has a good business and is improving its operating performance.
Once we buy a stock, our holding or selling decision is rarely decided by the prevailing market price of the stock.
Read: When to Sell a Stock
Operators may come and go. If the company is good, then an investor should hold on to the stock irrespective of short term price movements.
Hope it clarifies!
Answers to Investor’s Queries
Do we use mental models in stock analysis
Dear Dr. Malik,
I have just started reading your blog and found very informative, precise, to the point and very practical in applications, I have few queries and would like you to shed some light on it.
- Do you find the concepts of multi-disciplinary thinking (mental models- Charlie Munger) usable in common investing? If yes, then how they can be utilized. A case study will be appreciated.
- How can we discover some financial or non-financial factors that can seriously dent price of stock before any bad news hits them?
- Also, how much is past data useful to determine the future of stock as things are unpredictable and any sudden hiccup can crash the price of stock? Please mentions the parameters to include and exclude.
- Finally, if u want to create a stock screener, then what parameters you will use and give priority to.
Thanks for your feedback & appreciation! I am happy that you found the articles useful!
1) I do not specifically use any multidisciplinary thinking in stock analysis. However, as most of the investors have multidisciplinary background: Science, Engineering, Commerce, Medicine etc. before they start investing in stock markets, it becomes indistinguishable that their prior education/experience would have some impact on their approach to stock investing. The same, if impacts my stock analysis, then it would be there. Else, I like to keep the stock investing simple and straight forward and have a checklist handy to assess whether any stock meets my criteria.
You may read about my framework for stock analysis here:
2) Discovering financial/non-financial factors impacting the companies in the portfolio is part of regular monitoring of the stocks in the portfolio. I have written about the steps an investor should use for monitoring stocks in her portfolio in the following article:
3) I believe that past performance data is the most essential input to assess the quality of the business and the competence of the management of any company. These two factors, if found satisfactory, would tell an investor whether the company and its management would be able to face the unpredictable future by taking timely steps in the changing environment or not.
You may read about business analysis of a company in the following article:
You may read about the management analysis of a company in the following article:
4) Stock screening parameters: As mentioned above, I use a checklist for stock analysis. Most of the parameters in the checklist are objective parameters which can be used as a filter in the stock screening software.
Hope it clarifies your queries.
Role of macro-economic factors in the stock selection
Hi Dr Vijay,
Thank for your continuous support and prompt reply.
I have gone through in details about your website and almost all term and articles and got much more confidence in stock investment. I appreciate your work on such an excellent website in short and sweet guidance
I have analysed some good business and want to invest but awaiting since some of the fear factors.
Please clarify some of my concerns.
- There is global economic fear about the US and Europe recession in coming years (I read a lot for same), I have 60% invested in gilt funds and want to shift to stocks so should I invest now or wait to have good opportunity to come.
- Almost tensions are there in geopolitics, Indo- Pak-China, USA- Russia etc. factors.
- All these external factors should I consider for investment in good company or there will be a minor impact of such factors in future if the company business is good.
- Which is bad for investment from your point of view sir- Wait for some time and invest in late or invest in current time with good business.
Thanks in Advance,
Thanks for your feedback & appreciation! I am happy that you found the articles useful!
1, 2, 3) All these queries are related to external macro factors and their impacts on stocks. As detailed in my stock picking approach on the website, I am a bottom-up investor and do not base my investment decisions on macro factors. I ignore all the macro factors while investing.
4) The best time to invest is whenever the investor has money to spare and invest in markets. Whenever an investor is able to find good opportunities, she should invest.
Hope it clarifies your queries!
All the best for your investing journey!
Should we change the investing approach if we suspect asset bubbles?
I have some general queries relating to the aesthetics of the macroeconomic environment today. The ECB has started its own quantitative easing a few months back and the FED has almost done with that.
A question which bothers me is that with all this money floating in the markets the economic fundamentals are still at a low indicating that this money is creating some asset bubbles.
Of late, we have seen that the Indian tech startup environment has also begun receiving voluminous amounts of funding despite a weak revenue generation by these companies (the tech startups).
This brings me to my question which is the possibility of a bubble being created in the Indian economy.
Thanks for writing to me!
The bubble might be there or might not be there. It might be there in certain asset classes and might not be there in others.
My reading of other investors, as well as investing experience over the last 9 years, has established a belief that the investor should select quality stocks regardless of their industries and buy them at attractive prices. If stock prices go down due to the general economic situation, then it provides excellent buying opportunities.
Therefore, I would advise that investors should not pay attention to macro-economic factors and focus on buying good stocks at attractive prices.
How should one look at stocks during a steep fall in prices
Please could you tell us how to spot and load up on quality stocks in this fall?
Thanks for writing to me!
The approach to select stocks does not change with temporary changes in the market sentiment i.e. bull or bear phases.
An investor may follow the framework approach described in the article series: “Selecting Top Stocks to Buy” to find fundamentally sound companies for investment:
All the best for your investing journey!
I see you don’t mention anything based on sector-related info when analyzing.
Thanks for writing to me!
I follow a bottom-up fundamental analysis approach in which I look for high growth companies available at attractive stock prices. I agree with Peter Lynch that high growth companies in no growth industries are very good investments.
I believe that in bottom-up fundamental analysis, an investor should not worry about the industry in which a company operates. Instead, she should focus on identifying companies with sustainable distinct business advantage (Moat).
You may read about choosing our stock-picking approach here: Step by Step Process of Finding Multibagger Stocks
I meant to say about the stock you are analyzing and not about the approach using which you picked particular stock. Like when one analyzes a stock from the banking sector then few different ratios will be needed to check. When analyzing stocks in realty/infra, then debt can be little high and one needs to give little pass through in that case.
After reading your analysis, I got the impression that you analyze using a flat approach for all kind of stocks.
Thanks for the reply.
Thanks for your inputs.
I appreciate your observation that I use a framework for analysing the business performance of different companies. The framework around a few basic premises:
- Companies need to grow
- Maintain or improve profitability
- Operate efficiently
- Convert profits into free cash
- Use internal cash accruals to fund future growth.
This premise remains the same for all businesses. Even though there can be a lot of other parameters to access business performance, I believe that if an investor tracks performance of any company over the years, on these five parameters, then she would be able to gauge the business performance of almost all the companies.
You are right in citing that companies in one industry would have different levels of ratios (say profitability or D/E ratio) than companies in other industries. An investor might give a little pass while comparing two companies of different sectors.
However, if you analyse the business performance of any company over the past, then the trend of change in its ratios when compared with previous years would indicate, whether the company is showing improved business performance or not. E.g. an infra company might have higher debt than a pharma company. However, if the debt level is increasing year on year without an associated increase in sales and net worth, then it would indicate poor business performance for both infra and pharma companies.
I do not track Banking sector companies, therefore, would not extend my views on that.
Hope it clarifies your query!
Dr Vijay Malik
Is Peaceful Investing a Growth Investing Approach?
Undoubtedly you are one of those gems who are rapidly increasing the respect ladder of investment.
Like you, I am also a big fan of Screener. However, for last one year, I have been struggling to identify growth stocks. I saw your method of stock selection. I can understand all of these parameters apply to growth investing.
Do you have any specific experience, which you would like to share on spotting growth investing stocks?
Thanks for your feedback and appreciation! I am happy that you found the article useful.
You are right that the criteria mentioned by me under my stock selection strategies are for selecting stocks which are witnessing good growth in their business. However, I do not believe in overpaying for their growth.
In last one year, almost all stocks have run-up in their prices, therefore, it has become difficult to find good stocks available at reasonable prices. However, opportunities are still there, only the effort needed to find them has increased.
All the best for your investing and blogging journey!
Dr Vijay Malik
The investment philosophy of a reader, Ashish Malhotra
Friends, I am just 3 months old into the world of investing and have been learning about the investment methods quite intently.
I have read The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham and I am currently reading Security Analysis, by Dodd and Graham. These are profound books on investing.
Dr Malik comes very close to the concept of investment as suggested by Graham and he has presented a more practical approach by way of a step-by-step approach.
For a defensive investor, one should invest in index funds without trying to time the markets. Again, an important aspect is to look for value proposition in these index funds by way of looking at their PE ratios.
If one has a long investment horizon and invests regularly by way of systematic investment plans (SIPs), then there is no threat of losing money. A little knowledge of ups and downs of an index would come handy in getting good return from your investments as one can take advantage of the boom and gloom periods. This statement is better explained by Warren Buffett “Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.”
I count myself to be a defensive investor at the moment until I gain enough insight and understanding of our stock markets and identify & shortlist stocks that I would be comfortable investing for a long period of time.
Dr. Malik has given the first-hand understanding of how stocks should be chosen and invested in. I appreciate both the depth of his understanding and a simple and unnerving way of deciding the stocks that one would like to invest in.
If we gain the basic understanding, follow his guidelines in identifying stocks and courageously back our investments and hold on to our nerves during the irrational exuberance of highs and lows we would do reasonably well in growing our wealth.
Stock markets in the short run are voting machines and in the long run are weighing machines, which have to do an auto-correction over a long period of time. Stock markets are like “mandis”, where there are buyers for every seller, if there are more buyers than sellers, individual stocks would go up and vice versa.
Stock movements are random movements which one should take advantage of as much as possible. Although these are distractions for investors, these distractions make certain stocks very expensive and others very cheap and therefore an important behaviour of the stock market is to shuffle the funds/investments.
This movement/shuffling of funds is very well explained by Warren Buffett’s statement that the stock markets is a machine for putting the money from the impatient to the patient. For us as investors, as long as we can understand this phenomenon we should be more appreciative of this behaviour.
I, being a defensive investor, have started to buy banking exchange-traded funds (ETFs), infrastructure ETFs and energy stocks, which are selling cheap by way of valuations. These stocks do not look to be darlings of the stock markets currently but should do well in the 3-5 year horizon.
However, with a better understanding learned from Dr Malik and more learning with various articles online, I have started to create my own portfolio as well, which I would build as a portion of my investment. Based on my experience in the next 3-5 years, I would change the ratio of my investments from the defensive side to the enterprising investor like Dr Malik.
I would sincerely appreciate Dr Malik’s comments on my strategy: Should I be continuing with this approach or should do some course correction?
I would like to learn more and would welcome suggestions for good books to read for refining my approach further.
Thank you, Dr. Malik, for your articles and on behalf of all readers would like to extend our heartfelt thanks for extending your help in answering our questions and concerns in the most prompt manner.
Thanks for your feedback & appreciation! I am happy that you found the articles useful!
It feels good to see that you have started to build a good foundation for your investing journey, by reading Benjamin Graham.
He is indeed one of the greatest teachers of stock investing to a common investor. I can appreciate that you have been inculcating teachings of great investors when you mention:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.”
Stock markets in the short run are voting machines and in the long run, are weighing machines which have to do auto-correction over a long period of time
The stock markets are a machine for putting the money from the impatient to the patient.
You are right in saying that an investor should get the basic understanding of stock investing, make a system/framework for identifying stocks, courageously back her investments and hold on to her nerves during the irrational exuberance of highs and lows, then she would do reasonably well in growing her wealth. And until an investor feels that she has got the requisite expertise of stock investing, she can always choose to invest in mutual funds so that her errors of stock selection during initial phases do not have a lot of impact on her portfolio. Later on with gaining expertise, she can shift her money from mutual funds to her direct stock portfolio.
I feel happy that you have started in the right direction. After reading Benjamin Graham, you may read Peter Lynch. I have reviewed one of his books: One up on Wall Street in the following article:
All the best for your investing journey!
Dr Vijay Malik
This concludes the second part of this series of articles about the process of Selecting Top Stocks to Buy. Please let me know how you think about stock investing and the process that you follow.
- To know about the stocks in our portfolio, you may subscribe to the premium service: Follow My Portfolio with Latest Buy/Sell Transactions Updates (Premium Service)
- To learn our stock investing approach “Peaceful Investing” by videos, you may subscribe to the “Peaceful Investing” Workshop-on-Demand
- To download our customized stock analysis excel template: Click Here
- Learn about our stock analysis approach in the e-book: “Peaceful Investing – A Simple Guide to Hassle-free Stock Investing”
- Read more company analysis in the e-book series: Company Analyses
- To register for the upcoming “Peaceful Investing” workshop in your city: Click Here
- To pre-register/express interest for a “Peaceful Investing” workshop in your city: Click here
Registration status with SEBI:
I am registered with SEBI as a research analyst.
Details of financial interest in the Subject Company:
I do not own stocks of the companies mentioned above in my portfolio at the date of writing this article.