Fund Flow Statement Analysis: The Ultimate Guide

Modified: 08-Jun-21

Fund flow statement analysis is one of the simplest and the basic tools for stock analysis. Fund flow statement analysis helps investors in identifying the key areas of utilization of funds for a company during any period along with the key sources of those funds. Fund flow analysis provides great help to investors in finding companies, which are giving loans to promoters/related parties, doing significant capital expenditure, investments in subsidiaries etc.

More importantly, fund flow statement analysis helps the investors in identifying from where the company got this money, which it is now giving as loans to promoters/related parties/subsidiaries etc. An investor can easily find out whether the company is giving away the money, which it earned in profits or it is taking costly loans from banks and then forwarding this money to promoters/related parties. If the company is taking loans from banks to give it to promoters, then an investor would note that the company is doing so at the cost of public shareholders. This is because, the benefits of the money are being enjoyed by the promoters, whereas it will be the company (including public shareholders) who will have to repay the loan & interest to the banks.

Therefore, we believe that the simple exercise of fund flow statement analysis can help an investor check the shareholder friendliness, integrity and honesty of the promoters/management within a short period of time. As is usually said, “To know the truth, follow the money“. Therefore, fund flow analysis is the tool, which lets investors follow the money and bring to the light a lot of hidden aspects of the promoter/management decisions. This in turn lets the investor know whether her interests are being cared for by the company/management.

The current article provides an introduction to fund flow statement analysis with real-life examples of companies as a live demonstration of the concept. The article also provides answers to some of the important queries related to the fund flow analysis asked by investors.

What is Funds Flow Statement Analysis?

Movement of funds in the company’s balance sheet can be assessed by doing a comparative assessment of different sections of the balance sheet. An investor should compare the values of every section at the reporting date of the current year and the previous year and calculate the change in their values.

1) Equities and Liabilities:

In the liabilities section, any increase in an item means that the company has received funds (inflow), which need to be paid to external parties like:

  • shareholders (equity and reserves),
  • lenders (long term debt, short term debt etc),
  • vendors (trade payables),
  • customers (advances from customers usually part of other current liabilities)
  • employees (leaves, gratuity etc. as part of short term provisions)

Similarly, a decrease in any item in the liability section means that the funds have gone out (outflow) from the company to third parties to satisfy the existing liability.

2) Assets:

In the assets section, any increase in items means that the company has spent funds (outflow) to purchase assets, which would generate cash/funds inflow in future like:

  • Fixed assets (purchase of plant and machinery)
  • Long term loans & advances/Non-current investments (investments in long term financial products, JVs, subsidiaries etc.)
  • Current Investments (investments in short term financial products)
  • Inventory (raw material)
  • Trade receivables (payment due from customers)
  • Cash & equivalents (bank balance)
  • Short term loans & advances (loans to related parties, vendors etc.)

Similarly, a decrease in any item in the assets section means that the funds have come into the company (inflow) from third parties by way of sale of assets or collection of dues from third parties.

This contrasting interpretation of directional change (increase/decrease) in items in liabilities and assets sections and their impact on funds statement (inflow/outflow) becomes confusing for many investors. Therefore, it is essential that the reader spend extra care while interpreting the funds flow analysis.

To understand further, let’s see examples of a few companies where fund-flow analysis is used to make insightful interpretations.

Live Illustration of Fund Flow Statement Analysis

Supreme Industries Ltd:

In the screenshot below, the balance sheet items, which have increased in FY2020 when compared to FY2019 contain a “+” sign in front of them and the items, which have decreased in FY2020 from FY2019 carry a “-” sign in front of them. In addition, all the items that indicate a funds inflow have been shown in Green and all the items leading to funds outflow are shown as “Red”.

Therefore, a decrease in assets like “Investment in associate” or “Trade receivables” have “-” signs as their values have decreased in FY2020 when compared to FY2019; however, these are shown in “Green” colour as a decrease in the asset is a fund inflow.

Similarly, a decrease in liabilities like “Trade Payables-Others” or “Other current liabilities” have “-” sign as their values have decreased in FY2020 when compared to FY2019 and it is shown in “Red” colour as a decrease in liability is a fund outflow.

FY2020 annual report, page 112:

Supreme Industries Ltd Fund Flow Analysis

Please note Supreme Industries Ltd has a large balance sheet size of thousands of crores Rupees. Therefore, to simplify the analysis, we have skipped items that have changed by less than ₹5 cr over FY2019-2020. This is because an analysis of the items showing large changes is sufficient to give us the main picture of the fund flow analysis with respect to major sources of funds and major utilization of funds. Leaving out the items showing minor changes simplifies the analysis whereas only creating small rounding-off impacts.

The fund-flow analysis depicts that in FY2020, Supreme Industries Ltd has received funds from the following sources:

  • Increase in Borrowings: ₹250 cr
  • Other equity (primarily retained earnings): ₹107 cr
  • A decrease in Trade receivables: ₹75 cr
  • Increase in Finance lease liabilities: ₹30 cr
  • Increase in Other financial liabilities: ₹23 cr
  • A decrease in Investment in associate: ₹15 cr
  • Increase in Deferred tax liabilities: ₹12 cr
  • Total: ₹512 cr

Therefore, an investor notices that out of ₹512 cr, a major portion of funds (₹432 cr) has come from the retained earnings (₹107 cr), borrowings (₹250 cr), and from the collection of receivables due from customers (₹75 cr). (432 = 107+250+75).

So, Supreme Industries Ltd relied primarily on its profits, debt and collections to raise funds for FY2020.

The analysis also indicates that these funds have been used by the company in FY2020 in the following manner:

  • Increase in Cash & cash equivalents: ₹187 cr
  • Increase in Inventories: ₹140 cr
  • Increase in Right to use – lease: ₹59 cr
  • Increase in Other non-current assets: ₹43 cr
  • Purchase of Property, plant & equipment: ₹32 cr
  • A decrease in Other current liabilities: ₹27 cr
  • A decrease in Trade payables-Others: ₹11 cr
  • Increase in Other bank balance: ₹6 cr
  • Increase in Other financial assets: ₹5 cr
  • Increase in Other current assets: ₹5 cr
  • Total: ₹515 cr

An investor notices that the major usages of funds (₹472 cr) by Supreme Industries Ltd has been in inventories (₹140 cr), plant & machinery (₹32 cr), cash & investments in bank etc (187+6+5=₹198 cr), other non-current assets (₹43 cr) and right to use – lease assets (₹59 cr). (472=140+32+198+43+59).

To understand the details of different usages like “other non-current assets” and “right to use – lease assets” and the purpose of investments in these items, an investor needs to see their breakup under detailed notes to the financial statements.

When an investor analyses Supreme Industries Ltd, then she notices that the increase in “other non-current assets” is primarily due to an increase in balances with govt. authorities (primarily tax payments = ₹33 cr) and increase in capital advances (for expansion projects = ₹12 cr).

FY2020 annual report, page 122:

Supreme Industries Ltd Other Current Assets

On further analysis, the investor notices that the “right to use – lease” asset is created due to the adoption of a new accounting standard, IndAS 116 that reclassifies how a company treats its leased assets like building/office spaces etc. So, this basically is an investment in leased assets.

FY2020 annual report, page 102:

On transition to Ind AS 116 “Leases”, for these leases, lease liabilities were measured at the present value of remaining lease payments, discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate as at April 01, 2019. Right to Use if measured either at an amount equal to the lease liability adjusted by the amount of any prepaid or accrued lease payments.

After an overview of the usage of funds indicates that most of the money raised by Supreme Industries Ltd in FY2020, is kept by it in banks as cash & investments (₹198 cr), another major portion of the funds was consumed in inventories (₹140 cr), around ₹45 cr was consumed in payments to govt. authorities and capital advances, ₹32 cr in investment in plant & machinery and ₹59 cr in leased assets.

When the investor looks at the above usage of funds along with the major sources of funds (₹250 cr from borrowings, ₹107 cr from profits/retained earnings and ₹75 cr from the collection of trade receivables), then the investor feels that the company has effectively borrowed ₹250 cr from lenders and put it as cash & investments with banks (₹198 cr).

In light of the above analysis, an investor may conclude that raising money just to keep it in the bank might not be the best usage of the money. Nevertheless, it might be that the company plans to use this money early in the next financial year i.e. FY2021. Therefore, an investor may analyse the financial position of the company in the coming quarters to understand if it could use this money that it borrowed and then kept in the bank. If the company is able to use it in its business, then it is fine otherwise, it may not be the best strategy to borrow the money and let it lie in the bank.

An investor may read our detailed analysis of Supreme Industries Ltd in the following article: Analysis: Supreme Industries Ltd

While conducting the fund flow analysis, an investor should focus on the broad picture. She should focus on what are the large fund inflows and what are the large fund outflows.

She may find instances where most of the funds have come from profits/retained earnings and have been used largely for investments in plant & machinery, which is a healthy pattern. In addition, she may also find instances where most of the funds came from profits and the company could not use them for plant & machinery as there is no capital expansion project underway. Therefore, the company may use them to repay the debt (i.e. reduction in borrowings on the balance sheet) or may put that in the bank (increase in cash & equivalents or financial investments).

These are healthy patterns as the funds are generated from genuine business activities and are used in genuine business usages like capital expenditure, debt repayments or keeping it as an investment for future use.

On the contrary, an investor may come across fund flow statements where the company is making losses (i.e. reduction in reserves or other equity) and the company is raising funds from borrowings and using it to make investments. The investor should be very cautious if, on detailed analysis, she finds that the investments may be for taking money out of the company in the form of non-current investments in promoter-owned entities or loans & advances to related parties (promoter-owned entities).

Therefore, an investor should do a fund flow statement analysis of each company before making a final decision. It is a short exercise where attention to the large inflows and outflows have the potential to unearth management intentions, integrity and strategic business decisions.

Let us see an example where the fund flow analysis highlighted taking out of the funds from the company.

Using Fund Flow Analysis to identify syphoning of Funds by Promoters

Fund flow analysis has the potential of highlighting and early-stage identification of cases where management uses funds generated from the company (profits/reserves and debt) for its own benefits in form of loans and advances to group companies/promoter entities.

The case of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited (GAGL) is a pertinent example of funds diversion by the promoter/management, in which the majority shareholder/promoter/management took out the profits of GAGL and made it take debt, which GAGL did not need for its operations and used these funds to give loans to themselves. Promoters of GAGL (HIM Teknoforge Limited) in turn benefited at the cost of GAGL shareholders.

We highly recommend that an investor should read the detailed analysis of GAGL in which the funds’ diversion was identified by way of funds flow analysis in the following article:

Read: Why Management Assessment is the Most Critical Factor in Stock Investing?

We are providing a section of the fund flow analysis of GAGL below to help investors understand the immense help provided by fund flow analysis in the management analysis of any company:

Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd:

Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited is a small-cap company with a market capitalization of ₹33 cr. it was established in Baroda in 1973. The company makes auto and tractor components including transmission gears and axle shafts. Its products target OEMs and after-markets in India and sell under the brand name of KAG in India. The company also exports its products and has United States of America, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Belgium, Egypt, Dubai, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Australia etc. as its overseas markets.

Analysis of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited revealed that it was a great business. The following financial performance would reflect that the company has been showing the picture-perfect image of a good business:

Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd Financials Upto 2013
  1. Sales had been increasing at a good pace (17%)
  2. Profits had been increasing at an even higher pace
  3. All the profitability margins were at respectable levels and were improving further
  4. The company was a debt-free company and
  5. Has a cash chest, which was increasing year on year because its business was a cash cow.

Such a business is always a prize catch to investors and there was no surprise that in July 2013, the company was acquired by HIM Teknoforge Limited for ₹21.8 cr. when it purchased the 55% shareholding of erstwhile promoters.

HIM Tecknoforge Ltd Acquires Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd

The company went on with its business as usual under the new promoters and finished the next year, FY2014, by generating the highest ever sales of ₹29 cr. and profits of ₹5 cr.

However, the investors were in for a surprise when the balance-sheet of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited at March 31, 2014, was made public and it showed that the cash holding has reduced from ₹6cr. in FY2013 to ₹1 cr. in FY2014.

Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd Financials Upto 2014

The usage of cash remained a key issue to be found out as the company has not used it to pay a dividend to its shareholders.

The analysis of the balance sheet at March 31, 2014, showed that Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited has utilized its existing cash reserves (decline by about ₹5 cr.) as well as the profits generated in the year FY2014 (increase in reserves & surplus of about ₹4.5 cr) to provide loans & advance to some entity (increase by about ₹10 cr.).

Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd FY2014 Balance Sheet

The balance sheet of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited showed that it had only about ₹3 cr invested in the fixed assets used to make products to generate its sales & profits, whereas it has given a loan of about ₹10 cr to some entity. Such kind of loan, which makes loan assets more than fixed assets reflected that the management of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited is finding more value in lending the money than investing it in its core business.

As this business decision of the Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited had important implications, it becomes imperative for any investor to find out who is the entity to whom this loan has been given.

The investors could find these details in the annual report of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited for FY2014, in a section called “Related Party Transactions”:

Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd FY2014 Loan Given To Him Tecknoforge

Read: How Promoters benefit themselves using Related Party Transactions

Details in the related party transactions section revealed that Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited has given a loan (inter-corporate deposit) of ₹9 cr. to HIM Teknoforge Limited in FY2014.

This action by Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd meant that it has used its cash reserves and its entire profits for FY2014 and used it to give a loan to HIM Teknoforge Limited. HIM Teknoforge Limited is no one but the new promoter of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited, who has acquired it in July 2013 by buying 55% of the shares in the company.

It effectively meant that the new promoter, HIM Teknoforge Limited, within a few months of acquisition of Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited has used it as a source of funds (to the extent of ₹9 cr) to serve the purposes of HIM Teknoforge Limited. I doubt that minority shareholders could have controlled the loan, which HIM Teknoforge Limited being the management & largest shareholder, made Gujarat Automotive Gears Limited to give to itself.

When an investor continues further with the fund flow statement analysis of Gujarat Automotive Gears Ltd for next few years as highlighted in the article:  Why Management Assessment is the Most Critical Factor in Stock Investing?, then she notices that within next 3 years, the new promoter, HIM Teknoforge Ltd, took out more than ₹25 cr. from GAGL, which is even more than ₹21.8 cr, which it had paid to acquire control of GAGL.

The fund flow statement analysis in the above case shows that GAGL has effectively funded its own acquisition. This is because, over the next 3 years, the company has given more money than the acquisition cost to the new promoter.

Therefore, we believe that along with a very good financial analysis tool, the fund flow statement analysis is a very important tool for management analysis. This is because it helps investors understand what is the company doing with the money; from where it is raising the money and where it is using the money. Fund flow analysis opens up answers to a lot of such questions, which are otherwise never resolved for investors.

In addition, investors would note that fund flow statement analysis also provide inputs about:

  • whether the debt position of the company is improving or deteriorating by observing increasing or decreasing debt levels
  • whether the receivables position of the company is changing for better or worse by noticing an increase or decrease in trade receivables when compared with sales performance
  • Status of project progress:
  • In case capital work in progress (CWIP) is increasing, it would mean that the work on the project under implementation is progressing
  • In case CWIP has decreased and net fixed assets (NFA) has increased, it would mean that most probably the under-construction project has been completed and has been transferred from CWIP to NFA

Thus an investor can get multiple useful information points even from the cursory overview of summary balance sheet disclosed with financial results.

In light of the above, we believe that it is essential for every investor to conduct fund flow analysis on the companies she analyses for investing. It is a simple but very effective tool to understand the management intentions, integrity and shareholder friendliness.

Let us now get further clarifications to the concept of fund flow analysis by answering important queries asked by investors:

Readers’ Queries about Fund Flow Statement Analysis

Can inventory losses (write-down) lead to erroneously inflated funds inflow?

Hello sir,

I understand that while calculating cash flow from operations (CFO), we adjust for the working capital (WC) changes to arrive at CFO.

While analysing the CFO calculation of a commodity type business, I saw that the changes in the inventory led to the addition of a large amount of inflow in CFO and thus heavily inflated the CFO.

The company in question uses commodity as raw material (RM). The raw material/inventory was valued at very high prices last financial year inventory closing as the commodity was at its cyclical peak. However, in the recent year commodity prices has corrected to very lows (recent year inventory values). Therefore, the value of inventory at the end of the year has come down significantly. I understand that while adjusting for the working capital in CFO calculation, the reduction in the value of inventory on the balance sheet during a year is shown as cash inflow.

Therefore, I feel that the losses in the inventory held by the company due to a decline in the price of the commodity have the potential of inflating the CFO.

So while analysing the fund flow analysis from the balance sheet or cash flow analysis, how should we consider such changes, which may not be real?

Author’s Response:

Hi,

Thanks for writing to us!

We believe that in such cases of inventory write-down only a case to case based awareness is sufficient for investors and no change to the general method of CFO calculation is needed.

Let us see the impacts on both the balance sheet fund flow analysis as well as the cash flow from operations (CFO) calculation in the case of inventory write-down.

1) Fund flow statement analysis from the balance sheet:

The decline in inventory will be factored in profit & loss statement as a loss/expense, which will reduce the profits and in turn will reduce the retained earnings (shareholders equity).

If we ignore all other transactions, then in the fund flow analysis, the fund inflow due to decline in an asset (inventory) will be matched with fund outflow due to decline in shareholders’ equity (reduction in retained earnings due to loss in P&L because of inventory write down).

2) Calculation of cash flow from operations (CFO):

The positive entry of change in inventory in the CFO calculation under working capital changes nullifies the impact of loss recognised in the P&L due to inventory write down. This positive entry in CFO does not inflate CFO but cancels out the impact of reduction from loss due to inventory write-down in the profits.

If we do not add the positive change due to reduction of inventory in CFO, then the CFO will be unduly reduced from inventory write-down losses (which is a non-cash item).

Hope it answers your queries.

All the best for your investing journey!

Regards

Dr. Vijay Malik

How to determine equity contribution in Fund Flow Statement Analysis?

Hi Dr. Malik,

I learned fund flow analysis from your class in Bangalore and I am trying to implement it for KRBL Ltd. However, I am unable to figure out which number needs to be used when calculating “Equity”. Should we be using:

  1. The difference between last year’s equity and current year’s equity or
  2. PAT for the current year to come to a conclusion?

Any help would be much appreciated 🙂

Regards,

Author’s Response:

Hi,

Thanks for writing to us!

In the case of fund flow analysis, while comparing the balance sheet of two years, we use the difference in the Equity (equity is the sum of equity capital and reserves & surplus).

Further advised reading: Understanding the Annual Report of a Company

The change in equity would be a result of retained earnings (PAT – dividend including dividend distribution tax) and other sources like equity raising due to IPO/FPO etc. or equity reduction due to buybacks etc.

We cannot use PAT straightaway in fund flow analysis because as mentioned above, a few other things other than PAT would also impact equity: like dividend distribution, equity raising or equity reduction etc.

All the best for your investing journey!

Regards

Dr. Vijay Malik

Will the fund inflow and fund outflow be always equal in Fund Flow Statement?

Dear Dr. Malik,

Many thanks for this article. Though I read the funds flow statement in MBA, never really applied it while analysing a company. Of course, I used to look at the movement of assets and liabilities, and check the cash flow statement, however, putting it down and seeing the movement does help. I have already incorporated this to a few companies that I am tracking now.

Just one question. When we check the overall figure, should the funds received be greater than or at least equal to funds used, for us to safely infer that the company is using the primary source of funds to repay the debt? Have you come across any instance where the total funds used is greater than the total funds received? Sorry if this is a stupid question. Thanks a lot.

Author’s Response:

Hi,

Thanks for writing to me! I am happy that you found the article useful.

I am happy that you have started using the funds’ flow in your stock analysis. It is a very good tool to weed out shareholder unfriendly managements.

The funds’ movement also follows the double-entry system and therefore, the sources of funds (received) will always be equal to the usage of funds (usage). In the above example, I have done some rounding off, therefore, there might be some mismatches in receipts and usage. Otherwise, if you conduct this exercise by transferring the summary balance sheet in excel, then usage would match the receipts.

Hope it clarifies your queries! All the best for your investing journey!

Regards,

Vijay

Why the increase in cash & equivalents is a fund outflow?

Hello Sir,

Sir, if there is an increase in cash and cash equivalent of the current asset section, is it not an inflow of money rather than outflow?  How it can be an outflow of a fund?

Author’s Response:

Hi,

Thanks for writing to me!

Increase in cash & equivalents is an increase in an asset (bank balance), which can be understood as a cash outflow from the company to the Banks which leads to an increase in the asset of bank balance. It is similar to the cash outflow from the company when it buys any investment product. Investment in such products leads to cash outflow from the company and resultant increase in holding of the financial/investment product like mutual funds etc.

Read: Understanding The Annual Report Of A Company

Hope it clarifies your queries!

All the best for your investing journey!

Regards

Vijay

P.S.

Disclaimer

Registration status with SEBI:

I am registered with SEBI as a research analyst.

Details of financial interest in the Subject Company:

I do not own stocks of the companies mentioned above in my portfolio at the date of writing this article.

Related Posts:

Subscribe And Get 4 Ebooks Free Portrait

Sign up and get 4 free e-books

In-depth analysis of 55 companies

  • Portfolio returns of 26.4% against Sensex returns of 12.1%.
  • We identified companies, which were later invested by Sanjay Bakshi, Mohnish Pabrai, PE funds, Mutual Funds
  • See details of stocks in our portfolio
  • Get updates of buy/sell transactions in our portfolio by email

“Peaceful Investing” is the result of my experience of about 15 years in stock markets. It aims to find such stocks, where after investing, an investor may sleep peacefully. If later on, the stock prices increase, then the investor is happy as she is now wealthier. If the stock prices decline, even then the investor is happy as she can now buy more quantity of the selected fundamentally good stocks.

Learn Balance Sheet Analysis Video Peaceful Investing Workshop On Demand
Play Video

Please share your comments here:

1. IMPORTANT: You MUST do a search on Google and on our website to find answer to your query before writing it here. It will save your time as well as our time.
2. To use images in the comments, upload them on any image sharing website and then use the link in the comments.
3. All comments are moderated. Your comment will be visible after we approve/reply to it.

Leave a Comment

21 thoughts on “Fund Flow Statement Analysis: The Ultimate Guide

  1. Hi Sir, I have tried fund flow analysis for Excel Industries Ltd for FY 2018-19. After the exercise, I found that trade payables fall under funds inflow and trade receivables under funds outflow, which should be generally the other way. Is it possible and whether I am missing anything?

    • Hi Mohan,
      We request you to read the above article on Fund Flow Analysis once again and focus on the section that describes the interpretation of increase or decrease in assets and liabilities as inflow or outflow. This will help you in getting your answer.
      Regards,
      Dr Vijay Malik

      • Hi sir,
        Thanks for the reply.
        I have read it again and rechecked my exercise. In the example of Supreme Industries Ltd, which you have projected, the trade payables were -11 Cr (negative & RED) which is a cash outflow. In my exercise of Excel Industries Ltd, it is coming as +509 Lakhs (Positive & Green), which is a cash inflow. Please clarify how to proceed further.

        • Hi Mohan,
          The above article illustrates the concept as well as a sample example on how to interpret Fund Flow Analysis. You may do the fund-flow analysis exercise and interpret it accordingly.
          Regards,
          Dr Vijay Malik

  2. Sir,
    In funds flow analysis, I used to see whether the long-term surplus is generated to meet the short-term deficit so that long-term sources are generated to ensure that the current ratio is above 1.25. And also to ensure that the short-term funds are not diverted to meet long-term purposes like capital expenditure (CAPEX), repayment of long term loans etc., which only starve the company of funds to meet working capital needs. But, I learnt now that funds flow analysis interpreted by you is more wide-angled and reflects the management’s financial prudence.
    Thank you

  3. Hello Sir,
    I have been reading your articles daily and finding them quite informative. While I was going through this one, I got doubts about the classification of balance sheet items as a source of funds and utilization of funds for Supreme Industries. Understanding accounting terms does not come so easily to me. Could you see my interpretation of some of the items and correct me if I am wrong:
    a. Increase in Financial Lease Liabilities: It means the company borrowed more financial instruments to raise money. Therefore a source.
    b. Increase in Other Financial Liabilities: Same as above.
    c. Decrease in Investment in Associates: Less money invested this year on associates by buying back of shares as you explained in one of the queries above. Therefore, a source.
    d. Decrease in Trade Receivables: More customers have already paid this year, therefore more money came. Therefore, a source.
    e. Decrease in Trade Payables: I could not figure out how this can be the utilization of funds. In fact, less customers were paid this year, so more money was saved, so should not it be a source of funds for the company?
    f. Decrease in Other Current Liabilities: Like the trade payables above, I could not figure it out how it is a fund utilization.
    Regards,

    • Hi Anuradha,
      Thanks for writing to us!
      In your comment, we notice that there is a gap in the understanding of what the annual report represents. The data presented in the annual report for any year-end (i.e. March 31) is the outstanding amount at March 31. It does not represent the money given or taken by the company during the year.
      A) For example, in your comment on “Decrease in Investment in Associates: Less money invested this year on associates by buying back of shares” it indicates that as per your understanding if Investment in Associates declines from Rs. 100 to Rs. 70, it means that the company invested only Rs. 70 in associates this year. However, it is an erroneous understanding. This is because if the company had invested Rs. 70 in associates in the year, then the annual report will show the investment in associates at Rs. 170 at current year-end (Rs. 100 investment of last year + Rs. 70 investment of current year). And Rs. 70 will be a fund outflow from the company to associates.
      The correct understanding of a decline in Investment in Associates from Rs. 100 to Rs. 70 in the year is that the company took out Rs. 30 from its investments in associates. Therefore, the company received an inflow of Rs. 30 and the investment of Rs. 70 remained in Associates.
      B) For “Decrease in Trade Payables: I could not figure out how this can be the utilization of funds. In fact, less customers were paid this year”. Trade payables represent the money to be paid to suppliers/vendors. It is not related to customers.
      We request you to revisit the fund-flow analysis of the company in light of the above observations and then rephrase your queries in the light of your new understanding.
      Regards,
      Dr Vijay Malik

      • Yes, Sir, you are right. I had read earlier that a balance sheet is prepared for a particular date while P&L shows data over a particular time frame. I had read this thing sometime back when I had started reading about stocks but somehow, I did not give much importance to the time frames, and hence there was an error in my expression of the query. So, thanks for pointing this very important thing. As I read today at Chron, “While values of assets, liabilities and equity in the balance sheet are accumulated overtime on a continuing basis, amounts of revenues, gains, expenses and losses are reset and measured from each accounting cycle. In other words, balance sheet values at any date are the balance sheet values at the prior date plus any increases and minus any decreases, but income statement amounts of any period are independent of those from any other periods.”
        For the second point, you are right that payables are the money to be paid to vendors and not customers. Hence, it is resource utilization. Thanks again for pointing out that.

  4. Hello Sir,
    The website has been packed with great information. Thank you so much for explaining in layman words. Just one question – Is there any student discount running for accessing the premium content?

  5. Hello Sir,
    Thank you for sharing your wisdom!! I have a question regarding a situation which is a decrease in Shareholders equity(fund outflow or application of funds) in the liabilities side and a decrease in financial investments(Fund inflow or source of funds) in the asset side. What does it mean? Can be the source of funds from the asset side and the application of funds from the liability side?
    Regards,
    Sajan

    • Dear Sajan,
      Thanks for writing to us. We are happy that you found our work value-adding!
      In such a situation, an investor should read the detailed note in the annual report containing details of each item of shareholders’ equity. Looking at the breakup will provide the investor with the required information.
      One situation that comes to our mind that satisfies both the conditions mentioned by you is: the company may have done a buyback the shares using funds that were earlier invested in the financial investments. In this situation, the decrease in financial investments will be the source of funds and the buyback of share leading to a decline in share premium under shareholders’ equity would be the utilization of funds.
      This is our interpretation. However, an investor will get the final answer by a detailed reading of the notes to the financial statements in the annual report.
      Regards,
      Dr Vijay Malik

      • Dear sir,
        The company has paid huge dividends (82% payout) and the balance sheet which I have mentioned is the half-yearly balance sheet. Can dividends be a reason for the above-said condition?
        Thanks for the reply!!
        Regards
        Sajan

        • Hi Sajan,
          Thanks for writing to us! We are happy to see that you are doing your own equity analysis and spending time and effort to understand different concepts.
          We request you to go through the past annual reports of the company and read the breakup of shareholders’ equity/reserves & surplus. This would intimate you how the company treats/adjusts dividends in its balance sheet. Thereafter, We request you to go through the fund flow analysis article once again and use the same on the half-yearly balance sheet of the company. You will get the sources of fund inflow and outflow and hopefully, you will get your answer as well. Thereafter, for further clarifications, you may contact the company directly.
          Regards,
          Dr Vijay Malik

  6. Respected Sir,
    Thanks for maintaining such an informative blog. I learned a lot from these articles. While looking at the financials TCS, I found that even though the company made a profit in 2019 and 2020; after paying dividends, the reserves still went down. I am not able to understand this fact. Can you help me understand this?
    Thanks in advance for all your help.
    All data is from Screener.
    2019 – Net Profit (31472 Cr), Dividend (11250)
    2020 – Net Profit (32340 Cr), Dividend (27375)
    2019 – Reserves (89071)
    2020 – Reserves (83751)
    Fund Outflow 2020 – Net Block (8638), Other Liabilities (612)
    Fund Inflow 2020 – Borrowings (6844), Other Liabilities (4695), Investments (2974), CWIP (57).
    So, it seems the fund inflows were more than sufficient to meet the fund outflow, so the reserves shouldn’t have been depleted.

    Arun Deshpande

  7. Hello Sir,
    Why +/- symbols have been used prior to case outflow in the above case
    trade payable has – sign
    trade receivables have + sign
    Here both cases are money outflow but why trade receivables have “+” symbols

    • Hi Athinandhan,

      Thanks for writing to us!

      Now, we have expanded the illustration of the underlying factors used to determine the “+” or “-” in the example in the above article. You will get the answer for “+” and “-” signs in the section “Live Illustration of Fund Flow Statement Analysis” in the above article.

      Let us know if you need any further clarifications.

      All the best for your investing journey!

      Regards
      Dr Vijay Malik

Subscribe And Get 4 Ebooks Free Portrait

Sign up and get 4 free e-books

In-depth analysis of 55 companies