Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

When a company should sell all assets and invest money in FDs?

Modified: 08-Jun-21

The current article in this series provides responses related to the following queries:

  • When a company is better off by selling all its assets and invest the money in Bank’s fixed deposits?
  • Applicability of (net PAT/total assets vs FD) to banking/financial institutions/service sector companies
  • Use of PBT/NFA for estimating asset productivity

When a company is better off by selling all its assets and invest the money in Bank’s fixed deposits?

Hi Dr. Vijay,

I was one of the participants of your “Peaceful Investing” workshop in Delhi on May 13, 2018. I had a query while I was going through your ‘Peaceful investing’ e-book.

On page 100, we have a snippet of financials of ‘Atul Auto Ltd’. The sales growth looks good. Good profit growth in absolute numbers. However, my doubt comes from the fact that at the bottom line for the P&L, the business has only 6-8% NPM. Is this a good number to have for any business?

I understand that this is a capital-intensive business. However, at the end of the year, it is still generating only 6-8% for equity holders after repaying the debt, compared to 6-7% return from a fixed deposit. The free cash flows may be good, but shouldn’t the net profit be much better than that.

I think I may be missing something here. To understand it better, I will appreciate your help on this!

Regards,

Author’s Response:

Hi,

Thanks for writing to us! It was great to have you at the workshop!

We believe that comparing the net profit margin (NPM) with fixed deposit (FD) interest rate may not be a like-to-like comparison. Let us illustrate:

Let us assume if we invest ₹100/- in an FD and the interest rate is 7%. Then in one year, we will have interest income (pre-tax) of ₹ 7/-. We will pay about ₹2 as a tax (30%) and therefore, we will have ₹5 as income after tax.

In this example, the NPM is about 70%, which is after-tax income/Total income = 5/7

However, this case represents that the total assets put in the business/FD are ₹100, which provided after-tax net income of ₹5/-. So the total return on assets is 5% i.e. after-tax income/total assets = 5/100

Further advised reading: How to do Financial Analysis of Companies

If in case of companies, we find that the net profit after tax on total amount of assets is less than the net profit after tax earned by investing the same amount in FD, then we may arrive at the conclusion that it is not worthwhile to run the business.

Over time, while analysing companies for readers’ submissions, we have found that many companies are not able to earn a return on their total assets that are higher than fixed deposits. An investor may read some of the examples in the following articles:

Therefore, to conclude, we believe that an investor may compare the cases, where if a company invests all its assets in FD, then what money it would have earned after tax. If that return from FD after tax is higher than the net profit after tax (PAT) from running the business, then it might mean that putting all the effort to run the business may not be worth it.

Hope it answers your queries.

All the best for your investing journey!

Regards,

Dr Vijay Malik

Follow up query:

Applicability of (net PAT/total assets vs FD) to banking/financial institutions/service sector companies

Sir, a follow up query about comparing (net PAT/assets employed) with fixed deposit (FD) returns. Is there any such way of comparing banking/finance stocks like this manner?

Most of these companies have return on assets of 1-2% and comparing with FD returns of 5% (after tax) I suppose can’t be done.

Regards,

Author’s response:

Hi,

Thanks for writing to us!

In case of financial institutions or other services companies, fixed assets are not the primary determinant of returns. This is because these companies have people oriented businesses. A company can increase its business by hiring more employees (bankers/software developers etc.) within the existing assets (buildings). The company may not need to invest in new physical assets each time it increases the number of employees to increase the business.

Therefore, in case of financial institutions and other services companies, the physical assets are not the primary factor influence the returns/profits. As a result, the parameter of net PAT/assets employed may not be highly relevant for such companies.

Hope it answers your queries.

All the best for your investing journey!

Regards

Dr. Vijay Malik

Use of PBT/NFA for estimating asset productivity

Dear Dr Malik,

In your analysis on Castex Technologies Ltd (erstwhile Amtek India Ltd), you have compared profit before tax (PBT)/net fixed assets (NFA) with fixed deposit (FD) rates. Is there any specific reason that you would prefer to compare PBT/NFA% with FD rates, instead of CFO/NFA% with FD rates?

CFO/NFA% for Castex Technologies Ltd comes to 12%, which is higher than the FD rate, & hence the question.

I understand, as you have mentioned elsewhere in many articles, that finance is versatile and it depends on individual investor preference. However, your reason would be helpful in the assessment.

Regards,

Author’s response:

Hi,

Thanks for writing to us!

Cash flow from operations (CFO) may contain the impact of business of previous years as well when receivables of last year are collected in this year. Similarly, CFO may not show the effect of full business done in the current year as many times receivables may be delayed to the next financial year.

Further advised reading: Understanding Cash Flow from Operations (CFO)

Therefore, to assess asset utilization, we prefer PBT/NFA.

All the best for your investing journey!

Regards

Dr Vijay Malik

P.S.

Disclaimer

Registration status with SEBI:

I am registered with SEBI as a research analyst.

Details of financial interest in the Subject Company:

I do not own stocks of the companies mentioned above in my portfolio at the date of writing this article.

Related Posts:

Subscribe And Get Free Ebooks

Sign up to get updates

+ Get 12 free e-books on Stock Analysis

  • Buy/sell recommendations for selected stocks with a crisp investment rationale
  • We have selected these stocks after an in-depth financial, business, valuation, and management analysis

“Peaceful Investing” is the result of my experience of more than 15 years in stock markets. It aims to find such stocks, where after investing, an investor may sleep peacefully. If later on, the stock prices increase, then the investor is happy as she is now wealthier. If the stock prices decline, even then the investor is happy as she can now buy more quantity of the selected fundamentally good stocks.

Learn Balance Sheet Analysis Video Peaceful Investing Workshop On Demand
Play Video

Please share your comments here:

1. IMPORTANT: You MUST do a search on Google/ChatGPT and on our website to find answer to your query before writing it here. It will save your time as well as our time.
2. Strictly NO COPYING from online sources. We delete such comments without replying.
2. To use images in the comments, upload them on any image sharing website and then use the link in the comments.
3. All comments are moderated. Your comment will be visible after we approve/reply to it.

Leave a Comment

2 thoughts on “When a company should sell all assets and invest money in FDs?

  1. Sir, in the first example of Atul Auto, net fixed asset turnover (NFAT) and inventory turnover ratio (ITR) should also be considered for comparison with a fixed deposit (FD) returns. In simple words, an FD gives us a 6-7% return once a year. But in industry, capital employed churns multiple times in a year and converts into sales.

    Example: Suppose a company employed ₹100 in a business. Suppose ₹70 in fixed assets and ₹30 in the inventory of raw materials. So ₹70 will convert into sales about 3 times in a year (normal NFAT 1.4-4). Hence ₹70 will convert into sales of ₹210.
    And ₹30 of inventory will convert into sales about 5 times (normal inventory days 45-60) days. Hence ₹30 will convert into sales of ₹150.
    Total sales will be 210+150= ₹360.
    Net profit margin (NPM) 6% on ₹360 = ₹21.6
    Hence the return of ₹100 employed will be about 21%.

    Sir, it is just my opinion after reading the topic, this is not to counter any reader of articles. If anything is wrong above, it will be my great pleasure to read/hear your valuable comments.

    • Dear Ashok,

      Thanks for writing to us!

      In the example, we request you to elaborate on your understanding that the fixed assets and inventory will work separately and contribute to sales independent of each other. i.e. if the total sales of the company in the year are ₹360/-, then how does one know that ₹210/- of sales is due to fixed assets and the remaining ₹150/- is due to inventory.

      And if the total sales of the company are ₹360 and the net fixed assets are ₹70 and inventory is ₹30, then please reassess what would be the net fixed asset turnover and inventory turnover of the company. The following articles will help you in this regard:

      1) Asset Turnover Ratio: A Complete Guide for Investors
      2) Inventory Turnover Ratio: A Complete Guide

      Request you to rephrase your query in the light of learning from reading the above two articles. We would be happy to provide our input to your line of thought.

      Regards,
      Dr vijay Malik

Subscribe And Get Free Ebooks

Sign up to get updates

+ Get 12 free e-books on Stock Analysis